<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In the Wake of Virginia Tech</title>
	<link>http://gayportlandblog.com/2007/04/21/in-the-wake-of-virginia-tech/</link>
	<description>...Because sometimes IRC is just too temporal:)</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: p00ky</title>
		<link>http://gayportlandblog.com/2007/04/21/in-the-wake-of-virginia-tech/#comment-276</link>
		<author>p00ky</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 02:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gayportlandblog.com/2007/04/21/in-the-wake-of-virginia-tech/#comment-276</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Tif.  The MMPI (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory)- still one of the benchmarks for "normalcy" - was developed from the answers to a questionaire that was given to the visitors (mostly family) of the residents of a rural Minnesota mental hospital.  This, imho, does not negate the obvious fact that cho was mad as a hatter, but i think does further your point, and the discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Tif.  The MMPI (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory)- still one of the benchmarks for &#8220;normalcy&#8221; - was developed from the answers to a questionaire that was given to the visitors (mostly family) of the residents of a rural Minnesota mental hospital.  This, imho, does not negate the obvious fact that cho was mad as a hatter, but i think does further your point, and the discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: csimon</title>
		<link>http://gayportlandblog.com/2007/04/21/in-the-wake-of-virginia-tech/#comment-268</link>
		<author>csimon</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gayportlandblog.com/2007/04/21/in-the-wake-of-virginia-tech/#comment-268</guid>
		<description>'normal' cannot be reconciled as thus no agreed upon definition exists and anybody using it is surely attempting to pull the wool over your eyes. --burp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;normal&#8217; cannot be reconciled as thus no agreed upon definition exists and anybody using it is surely attempting to pull the wool over your eyes. &#8211;burp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: csimon</title>
		<link>http://gayportlandblog.com/2007/04/21/in-the-wake-of-virginia-tech/#comment-265</link>
		<author>csimon</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gayportlandblog.com/2007/04/21/in-the-wake-of-virginia-tech/#comment-265</guid>
		<description>nod. keen. the social stratification will surely be propounded, yielding an even greater encumbrance on 'how you should behave and what's 'normal''. -_-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nod. keen. the social stratification will surely be propounded, yielding an even greater encumbrance on &#8216;how you should behave and what&#8217;s &#8216;normal&#8221;. -_-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
